Md. Towhidul Islam

In the wake of shifting global markets in 2025, the stability of our financial world depends on a set of rules crafted in a quiet city in Switzerland. The Basel Accords are the international regulatory standards designed to ensure that banks maintain enough cushion—in the form of capital—to absorb losses and stay solvent during economic downturns.

Administered by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), these accords act as the “global safety manual” for the banking industry.


The Evolution of Financial Security

The Basel framework has evolved through three primary stages, each reacting to the lessons of past financial crises.

Basel I (1988): Setting the Minimums

The original accord was a response to the growth of international banking and the need for a “level playing field.” It introduced the concept of Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA). Under Basel I, banks were required to hold capital equal to at least 8% of their RWAs. While revolutionary, it was a “one-size-fits-all” approach that didn’t distinguish between a safe loan and a risky one.

Basel II (2004): The Three Pillar Framework

Basel II moved toward a more sophisticated model, allowing banks to use internal ratings to assess risk. It introduced the “Three Pillar” structure that remains the industry standard:

  1. Pillar 1: Minimum Capital Requirements: Refined how credit, market, and operational risks are calculated.
  2. Pillar 2: Supervisory Review: Empowered regulators to evaluate a bank’s risk management beyond just the numbers.
  3. Pillar 3: Market Discipline: Required banks to disclose their financial health publicly to encourage transparency.

Basel III (2010–2017): Resilience and Liquidity

The 2008 financial crisis revealed that banks were not just short on capital, but also short on cash. Basel III was introduced to fix this by adding Liquidity Ratios:

  • Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR): Banks must hold enough high-quality liquid assets to survive a 30-day “run on the bank.”
  • Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR): Encourages banks to fund their long-term assets with reliable, long-term sources of money rather than volatile short-term loans.

2025: The “Basel III Endgame”

As of 2025, the global focus has shifted to the finalization of Basel III, often referred to by industry experts as Basel IV. The primary goal of this “Endgame” is to limit the “gaming” of the system.

The most significant change is the Output Floor. This rule mandates that even if a bank’s own complex math suggests they can hold very little capital, they must still hold at least 72.5% of the capital required by the standard government formula. This ensures that even the largest global banks maintain a substantial “safety buffer” that cannot be modeled away.


Why It Matters for Trade and Growth

For the average citizen, the Basel Accords mean a lower chance of a systemic banking collapse that could freeze ATMs or wipe out savings. However, there is a trade-off: as banks are forced to hold more capital in reserve, the cost of lending for mortgages, car loans, and business expansions can sometimes increase.

In the context of Trade Finance, Basel regulations heavily influence the pricing of the Letters of Credit we discussed in our previous feature. If a bank must hold more capital against a trade loan, the fees for that LC will likely rise.


References and Further Reading

For readers seeking to explore the technical documentation and original standards, the following sources are the definitive references for the Basel Accords:

  1. Bank for International Settlements (BIS): Basel Committee on Banking Supervision: History of the Basel Committee. [www.bis.org]
  2. International Monetary Fund (IMF): Financial Sector Assessment Programs (FSAP) – Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision.
  3. Investopedia: Basel Accords: Basel I, II, and III Definitions and Requirements.
  4. Federal Reserve Board: Regulatory Capital Rule: Large Banking Organizations and Banking Organizations with Significant Trading Activity (The “Basel III Endgame” proposal).
  5. European Banking Authority (EBA): Implementation of Basel III in the EU (CRR III and CRD VI).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *